14 Sep 12, 09:58PM
I of course want to see more official maps, a large variety to choose from is never a bad thing. Of course official maps are held to a pretty high standard, they must look good and play well on the pubs or in matches, the community doesn't really need to worry about being flooded with sub-par officials.
Also, clans need to start agreeing on what maps will be played during the match (and other rules) before they start playing. Nobody can force you to play a map that you don't want to play. You have the option of saying 'no, I will not play that map please choose another' - why people feel obligated to play whatever map a clan may pick first is beyond me.
There are some official maps that only play well on the pubs. Edifice is pretty good example. It doesn't have a very competitive friendly layout. It was designed for large games on the public servers. I don't recommend that any clan use it to match on. Should these maps be taken out of the official package just because they don't play well in the competitive scene? I don't think so, especially not if we implement the clan match mastermode idea.
Also, clans need to start agreeing on what maps will be played during the match (and other rules) before they start playing. Nobody can force you to play a map that you don't want to play. You have the option of saying 'no, I will not play that map please choose another' - why people feel obligated to play whatever map a clan may pick first is beyond me.
There are some official maps that only play well on the pubs. Edifice is pretty good example. It doesn't have a very competitive friendly layout. It was designed for large games on the public servers. I don't recommend that any clan use it to match on. Should these maps be taken out of the official package just because they don't play well in the competitive scene? I don't think so, especially not if we implement the clan match mastermode idea.