13 Sep 12, 02:05AM
I don't see how a man can seem like a decent person when he wants to continue denying equal rights to all on religious reasons. I'm speaking of course about marriage equality. The typical arguments mitt has given to defend his stance consist of (loosely) "oh it's been the definition of marriage in the past" doesn't even come close to justifying this belief for the majority of American. For personal reasons, sure.
Not to say people don't agree with him and I'm sure there are many Americans that do. However, I personally do not want someone making decisions for a large population based on pseudo-moral religious grounds.
Between both the idiots, I think Obama is slightly more impartial than Mitt and this can be seen by what they say. But then again, who can believe any politician?
Not to say people don't agree with him and I'm sure there are many Americans that do. However, I personally do not want someone making decisions for a large population based on pseudo-moral religious grounds.
Between both the idiots, I think Obama is slightly more impartial than Mitt and this can be seen by what they say. But then again, who can believe any politician?