Still, looking at the pictures I don't know what the point you are trying to prove is. I am not a good judge of looks when it comes to men.... because honestly I would have no idea how to go about judging. What about their looks affected the votes? They all look like a bunch of stuff-shirts to me. Are you saying that the winners of the last five elections featured more attractive men? Roughly 50% of the American population is female, and estimated about 2-4% gay men. about 2-4% gay women. So if everyone that voted for the election winner was straight female or gay men, I guess there is a chance your theory might have some validity. But I would assume that is not the case. I would bet plenty of straight men voted for them too. Yea, i don't get your point.
*And, yes Misty... Bush was and still is easy to make fun of :P He's not that bright. But that doesn't mean he wasn't a good president.
*EDIT* If the presidents were chosen on looks, I would think Hillary would have beat Obama. BAHAHA
*And, yes Misty... Bush was and still is easy to make fun of :P He's not that bright. But that doesn't mean he wasn't a good president.
*EDIT* If the presidents were chosen on looks, I would think Hillary would have beat Obama. BAHAHA