26 Aug 12, 04:24AM
This would seem to support the idea that skins are even more the product of the user and less the makers of AC. Here's a question I've been thinking about:
Does the fact that AC is free disqualify any ethical issues? The makers of AC have nothing to gain, right? It's not like Half-life, where consumers bought the game for the Counter-strike mod.
Does the fact that AC is free disqualify any ethical issues? The makers of AC have nothing to gain, right? It's not like Half-life, where consumers bought the game for the Counter-strike mod.