Poll: Should spread be lower?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes, it's too high
41.67%
25 41.67%
No, it's fine
38.33%
23 38.33%
I'm not sure/ I don't care
20.00%
12 20.00%
Total 60 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Should spread be reduced?
#51
(16 Jan 12, 11:40PM)Roflcopter Wrote: There's a significant but not huge majority that are pro lowering spread.
Even more people agree that it should be distributed in a circular shape and more in the center than the edges.
Even more people either think it should be left alone or don't understand/care.

Quote:...Given all this what action will the developers be taking?
I cannot code, but if I could I wouldn't touch the spread.
I'm all for adjusting obvious problems (OP AR and pub SG), but as Stranz said, this has never been a big issue in the past. Why should it suddenly become one now?
I can see that you wish for AC to be geared more towards higher skill level players, because that's what you are, but the development team has to try and take on board the opinions of every AC player, even the ones who don't voice their concerns here (and even the ones who don't voice their concerns at all).
I really don't want to go through another schism like the 1.0 -> 1.1 change over, and I believe your proposal is significant enough that this could be risked.
As a reverse-disclaimer, I play almost exclusively SMG and would benefit greatly from this. However, I think it's unnecessary. Nothing to do with realism, nothing to do with skill, just "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". If it could be 'circle-ised' without altering the mean spread, I'd be happy.
Thanks given by:


Messages In This Thread
Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 12:27AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Mystered - 15 Jan 12, 12:34AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 01:00AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MerCyKiL - 18 Jan 12, 06:15AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ExodusS - 15 Jan 12, 12:59AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 01:27AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Lantry - 15 Jan 12, 01:46AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Mael - 15 Jan 12, 02:00AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 02:09AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by bballn45 - 15 Jan 12, 02:16AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 15 Jan 12, 02:27AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 02:44AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MCS - 15 Jan 12, 03:22AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 03:43AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MCS - 15 Jan 12, 05:01PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 05:52PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MCS - 15 Jan 12, 08:37PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 04:03AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Habluka - 15 Jan 12, 03:49AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MykeGregory - 15 Jan 12, 11:36AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Joe Smith - 15 Jan 12, 12:43PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 02:40PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by tempest - 15 Jan 12, 02:44PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 03:04PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by titiPT - 15 Jan 12, 12:50PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by macm - 15 Jan 12, 03:10PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 15 Jan 12, 06:09PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Lantry - 15 Jan 12, 08:16PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Benson - 16 Jan 12, 08:51PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Mael - 15 Jan 12, 09:16PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by YourSister - 16 Jan 12, 07:25AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Stranz - 16 Jan 12, 08:29AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MCS - 16 Jan 12, 01:18PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Harps - 16 Jan 12, 05:33PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MCS - 16 Jan 12, 06:44PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 16 Jan 12, 11:23PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Cemer - 17 Jan 12, 01:55AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 16 Jan 12, 11:40PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by jamz - 17 Jan 12, 11:59PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Lantry - 18 Jan 12, 01:04AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by #M|A#Wolf - 17 Jan 12, 12:01AM
Script Create? - by Arnold*-* - 17 Jan 12, 12:26AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ElCrema - 18 Jan 12, 05:32AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by #M|A#Wolf - 18 Jan 12, 05:47AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 18 Jan 12, 06:36AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Lantry - 18 Jan 12, 10:38PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Jason - 18 Jan 12, 11:32PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 18 Jan 12, 11:59PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 18 Jan 12, 01:38PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MerCyKiL - 19 Jan 12, 01:29AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 01:51AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by OpenSource - 19 Jan 12, 01:58AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by jamz - 19 Jan 12, 02:38AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Orynge - 19 Jan 12, 02:00AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by OpenSource - 19 Jan 12, 02:06AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 19 Jan 12, 02:38AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by OpenSource - 19 Jan 12, 02:58AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 02:20AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by #M|A#Wolf - 19 Jan 12, 02:31AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 02:32AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 02:38AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Lantry - 19 Jan 12, 03:49AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by OpenSource - 19 Jan 12, 02:38AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 02:45AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 19 Jan 12, 03:13AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 03:17AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by #M|A#Wolf - 19 Jan 12, 03:45AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Undead - 19 Jan 12, 04:26AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Orynge - 19 Jan 12, 01:04PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 19 Jan 12, 03:51AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 04:25AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MykeGregory - 19 Jan 12, 12:17PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by tempest - 19 Jan 12, 12:31PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by 1ceMaster - 24 Jan 12, 11:56AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MykeGregory - 28 Jan 12, 11:25AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 08 Mar 12, 09:35PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Think3r - 08 Mar 12, 09:42PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 08 Mar 12, 09:43PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Think3r - 08 Mar 12, 10:00PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Mr.OpTic - 08 Mar 12, 10:10PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ExodusS - 09 Mar 12, 04:20AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 09 Mar 12, 11:25AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by kingCHUBBY - 09 Mar 12, 01:27PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 09 Mar 12, 01:43PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MerCyKiL - 09 Mar 12, 02:15AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 09 Mar 12, 03:32AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MerCyKiL - 09 Mar 12, 03:43AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ExodusS - 09 Mar 12, 02:57PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MerCyKiL - 09 Mar 12, 04:12PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ExodusS - 09 Mar 12, 05:46PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 09 Mar 12, 09:19PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Andrez - 09 Mar 12, 07:05PM