Poll: Should spread be lower?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes, it's too high
41.67%
25 41.67%
No, it's fine
38.33%
23 38.33%
I'm not sure/ I don't care
20.00%
12 20.00%
Total 60 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Should spread be reduced?
#38
i am sort of confused how the spread works right now, but first thing i wonder if it works the same way since the very first day this game came out (the square where spread distributes not the spread itself), because if is such an important matter to take care off we would have seen it earlier as a topic of discussion.

and probably everybody wonders how come that reducing spread would make a big bunch of players less skilled, you say it has to do with the random spread that acts the same if not equally by firing even away of the center of the target, and by fixing it they shouldn't get any hit at all obviously.

still, i wouldn't think on aiming off my target even if that's how it works now. First, cause as far as i know, the spread starts increasing after a certain amount of bullets not right away, correct?. secondly, and by considering the first said, it would make less useful trying to aim off target since even if those shoots find to place on the center it would happen after few shoots you missed due the low spread of first bullets that would have landed if you actually aim where is supposed to. in time that mean you should win by hitting the center rather than off it. all this considering how it works right now.

if currently works that way, i can't even think of a fix, cause is doing what is supposed to without hurting the player aim.

anyways if the spread is this high, it would come handy to reduce it a bit and make the burst firing actually reliable, in that way you shouldn't feel it's a waste of time doing this as now you would die before hitting an opponent who is full auto on you
Thanks given by:


Messages In This Thread
Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 12:27AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Mystered - 15 Jan 12, 12:34AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 01:00AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MerCyKiL - 18 Jan 12, 06:15AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ExodusS - 15 Jan 12, 12:59AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 01:27AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Lantry - 15 Jan 12, 01:46AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Mael - 15 Jan 12, 02:00AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 02:09AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by bballn45 - 15 Jan 12, 02:16AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 15 Jan 12, 02:27AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 02:44AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MCS - 15 Jan 12, 03:22AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 03:43AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MCS - 15 Jan 12, 05:01PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 05:52PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MCS - 15 Jan 12, 08:37PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 04:03AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Habluka - 15 Jan 12, 03:49AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MykeGregory - 15 Jan 12, 11:36AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Joe Smith - 15 Jan 12, 12:43PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 02:40PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by tempest - 15 Jan 12, 02:44PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 03:04PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by titiPT - 15 Jan 12, 12:50PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by macm - 15 Jan 12, 03:10PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 15 Jan 12, 06:09PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Lantry - 15 Jan 12, 08:16PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Benson - 16 Jan 12, 08:51PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Mael - 15 Jan 12, 09:16PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by YourSister - 16 Jan 12, 07:25AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Stranz - 16 Jan 12, 08:29AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MCS - 16 Jan 12, 01:18PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Harps - 16 Jan 12, 05:33PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MCS - 16 Jan 12, 06:44PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 16 Jan 12, 11:23PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Cemer - 17 Jan 12, 01:55AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 16 Jan 12, 11:40PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by jamz - 17 Jan 12, 11:59PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Lantry - 18 Jan 12, 01:04AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by #M|A#Wolf - 17 Jan 12, 12:01AM
Script Create? - by Arnold*-* - 17 Jan 12, 12:26AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ElCrema - 18 Jan 12, 05:32AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by #M|A#Wolf - 18 Jan 12, 05:47AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 18 Jan 12, 06:36AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Lantry - 18 Jan 12, 10:38PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Jason - 18 Jan 12, 11:32PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 18 Jan 12, 11:59PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 18 Jan 12, 01:38PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MerCyKiL - 19 Jan 12, 01:29AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 01:51AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by OpenSource - 19 Jan 12, 01:58AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by jamz - 19 Jan 12, 02:38AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Orynge - 19 Jan 12, 02:00AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by OpenSource - 19 Jan 12, 02:06AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 19 Jan 12, 02:38AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by OpenSource - 19 Jan 12, 02:58AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 02:20AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by #M|A#Wolf - 19 Jan 12, 02:31AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 02:32AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 02:38AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Lantry - 19 Jan 12, 03:49AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by OpenSource - 19 Jan 12, 02:38AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 02:45AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 19 Jan 12, 03:13AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 03:17AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by #M|A#Wolf - 19 Jan 12, 03:45AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Undead - 19 Jan 12, 04:26AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Orynge - 19 Jan 12, 01:04PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 19 Jan 12, 03:51AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 04:25AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MykeGregory - 19 Jan 12, 12:17PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by tempest - 19 Jan 12, 12:31PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by 1ceMaster - 24 Jan 12, 11:56AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MykeGregory - 28 Jan 12, 11:25AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 08 Mar 12, 09:35PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Think3r - 08 Mar 12, 09:42PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 08 Mar 12, 09:43PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Think3r - 08 Mar 12, 10:00PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Mr.OpTic - 08 Mar 12, 10:10PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ExodusS - 09 Mar 12, 04:20AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 09 Mar 12, 11:25AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by kingCHUBBY - 09 Mar 12, 01:27PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 09 Mar 12, 01:43PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MerCyKiL - 09 Mar 12, 02:15AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 09 Mar 12, 03:32AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MerCyKiL - 09 Mar 12, 03:43AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ExodusS - 09 Mar 12, 02:57PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MerCyKiL - 09 Mar 12, 04:12PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ExodusS - 09 Mar 12, 05:46PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 09 Mar 12, 09:19PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Andrez - 09 Mar 12, 07:05PM