Poll: Should spread be lower?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes, it's too high
41.67%
25 41.67%
No, it's fine
38.33%
23 38.33%
I'm not sure/ I don't care
20.00%
12 20.00%
Total 60 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Should spread be reduced?
(09 Mar 12, 02:57PM).ExodusS* Wrote: Ok for the Carabine delay, not the damage, or the sniper will be owned by Carabine too...
The sniper is perfect, the delay is perfect, the damage need 1 more HP on the SVN to be ok, looks like the dev who changed the sniper on the SVN don't know this weapon well...
1 sniper bullet + 1 pistol bullet, WHO COMPLAINED THIS? NOBODY!
AR to 15 bullets only, now killing 2 players without reloading will need skill, the AR jump/rush will be more tactical. (already done, don't change it plzzz!)
SMG with less hit-drops will be far better in pubs, (and it's already far better on no-hit drops servers), i dont know if the spread should be reduced, the SMG is for mid/close range, the spread make it harder at long distances, and it's normal (yes normal).
The shotgun...lol play Cube.
The shotgun should be useless at far/mid distances, only advantaged in little ways/corridors/doors.
It must be a bit tactical, cause the shotgun ATM it's like, i run and i shot.

Really bad ideas.

Sniper+pistol combo kills in 400ms, quicker than any other weapon even at close range.

AR at 15 bullets won't work with current spread because the best players only hit 36% of their bullets on average. If the AR had 100% accuracy I'd be fine with a 15 round clip.

Completely useless shotgun at mid-long would be unplayable in clan matches.

The reason all the non-automatic weapons suck is because the game is played best with strategies that require the ability to inflict consistent amounts of damage. Faster firing sniper that does less damage gives more consistency without becoming OP.
Thanks given by:


Messages In This Thread
Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 12:27AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Mystered - 15 Jan 12, 12:34AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 01:00AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MerCyKiL - 18 Jan 12, 06:15AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ExodusS - 15 Jan 12, 12:59AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 01:27AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Lantry - 15 Jan 12, 01:46AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Mael - 15 Jan 12, 02:00AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 02:09AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by bballn45 - 15 Jan 12, 02:16AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 15 Jan 12, 02:27AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 02:44AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MCS - 15 Jan 12, 03:22AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 03:43AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MCS - 15 Jan 12, 05:01PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 05:52PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MCS - 15 Jan 12, 08:37PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 04:03AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Habluka - 15 Jan 12, 03:49AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MykeGregory - 15 Jan 12, 11:36AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Joe Smith - 15 Jan 12, 12:43PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 02:40PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by tempest - 15 Jan 12, 02:44PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 03:04PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by titiPT - 15 Jan 12, 12:50PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by macm - 15 Jan 12, 03:10PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 15 Jan 12, 06:09PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Lantry - 15 Jan 12, 08:16PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Benson - 16 Jan 12, 08:51PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Mael - 15 Jan 12, 09:16PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by YourSister - 16 Jan 12, 07:25AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Stranz - 16 Jan 12, 08:29AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MCS - 16 Jan 12, 01:18PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Harps - 16 Jan 12, 05:33PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MCS - 16 Jan 12, 06:44PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 16 Jan 12, 11:23PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Cemer - 17 Jan 12, 01:55AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 16 Jan 12, 11:40PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by jamz - 17 Jan 12, 11:59PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Lantry - 18 Jan 12, 01:04AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by #M|A#Wolf - 17 Jan 12, 12:01AM
Script Create? - by Arnold*-* - 17 Jan 12, 12:26AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ElCrema - 18 Jan 12, 05:32AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by #M|A#Wolf - 18 Jan 12, 05:47AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 18 Jan 12, 06:36AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Lantry - 18 Jan 12, 10:38PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Jason - 18 Jan 12, 11:32PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 18 Jan 12, 11:59PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 18 Jan 12, 01:38PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MerCyKiL - 19 Jan 12, 01:29AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 01:51AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by OpenSource - 19 Jan 12, 01:58AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by jamz - 19 Jan 12, 02:38AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Orynge - 19 Jan 12, 02:00AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by OpenSource - 19 Jan 12, 02:06AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 19 Jan 12, 02:38AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by OpenSource - 19 Jan 12, 02:58AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 02:20AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by #M|A#Wolf - 19 Jan 12, 02:31AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 02:32AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 02:38AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Lantry - 19 Jan 12, 03:49AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by OpenSource - 19 Jan 12, 02:38AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 02:45AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 19 Jan 12, 03:13AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 03:17AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by #M|A#Wolf - 19 Jan 12, 03:45AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Undead - 19 Jan 12, 04:26AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Orynge - 19 Jan 12, 01:04PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 19 Jan 12, 03:51AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 04:25AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MykeGregory - 19 Jan 12, 12:17PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by tempest - 19 Jan 12, 12:31PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by 1ceMaster - 24 Jan 12, 11:56AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MykeGregory - 28 Jan 12, 11:25AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 08 Mar 12, 09:35PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Think3r - 08 Mar 12, 09:42PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 08 Mar 12, 09:43PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Think3r - 08 Mar 12, 10:00PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Mr.OpTic - 08 Mar 12, 10:10PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ExodusS - 09 Mar 12, 04:20AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 09 Mar 12, 11:25AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by kingCHUBBY - 09 Mar 12, 01:27PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 09 Mar 12, 01:43PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MerCyKiL - 09 Mar 12, 02:15AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 09 Mar 12, 03:32AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MerCyKiL - 09 Mar 12, 03:43AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ExodusS - 09 Mar 12, 02:57PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MerCyKiL - 09 Mar 12, 04:12PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ExodusS - 09 Mar 12, 05:46PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 09 Mar 12, 09:19PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Andrez - 09 Mar 12, 07:05PM