28 Jul 15, 11:54AM
This is not just a matter of "being allowed to"
Its also that its pointless to add changes to a branch if they only sit there for ever for nothing.
That's why the other "publicly active" devs need to give their position about it, which none of them EVER did so far. Some of them obviously refused to for personal reasons, and took the very few negative comments about this work as an opportunity not to discuss it - even though the content itself was never really criticized, just the methods that we HAD to use
Its also that its pointless to add changes to a branch if they only sit there for ever for nothing.
That's why the other "publicly active" devs need to give their position about it, which none of them EVER did so far. Some of them obviously refused to for personal reasons, and took the very few negative comments about this work as an opportunity not to discuss it - even though the content itself was never really criticized, just the methods that we HAD to use