Poll: Should S&D be a AC mode
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
30.00%
12 30.00%
No
60.00%
24 60.00%
Maybe
10.00%
4 10.00%
Total 40 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

S&D or Search And Destroy
#14
(18 Sep 10, 05:40PM)Robtics Wrote: I just dont see how it would work with AC.

Simple. Mapmakers add two newly created entities, Bomb_A and Bomb_B. In_game and in S&D these bomb sights would glow different colors, or could be represented by an actual bomb site. Someone would design a bomb planting/defusing animation. When you go to plant the bomb it could be for example Crouch+Shoot when beside the bomb site. It would start the 1-3 second process of planting the bomb. That starts a timer. When the timer is done the bomb blows up and the offense wins. If the defense defuses the bomb the defense wins that round. OR, if one team eliminates the other team completely, the team left standing wins. I would give planting/defusing the bomb 2 points and eliminating the other team 1 point, that way people don't just treat it like Team Survivor. This game mode elicits extreme teamwork and tactics.
(18 Sep 10, 05:46PM)P@ndel Wrote: Heh, i wouldn't call all these people *closed-minded*, it is just not the game to adapt such game modes. After all, CoD and UT are really on a much different level of game play than is AC. The same mod just cannot be suited to another game just because the gameplay will not allow it (even if it does, people will not enjoy it). Good ideas though ;)

P@ndel

By UT do you mean Unreal Tournament? I never got the oppurtunity to play that =/. But there is bomb mode in UrbanTerror, which is a game as fast paced as this just with faster deaths and more aiming skill required.
Thanks given by:


Messages In This Thread
S&D or Search And Destroy - by Xenon - 18 Sep 10, 04:59PM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by Shorty - 18 Sep 10, 05:09PM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by Robtics - 18 Sep 10, 05:09PM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by Xenon - 18 Sep 10, 05:12PM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by tempest - 18 Sep 10, 06:02PM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by haydugjr - 18 Sep 10, 06:04PM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by P@ndel - 18 Sep 10, 07:03PM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by P@ndel - 19 Sep 10, 04:35PM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by P@ndel - 18 Sep 10, 05:16PM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by Xenon - 18 Sep 10, 05:21PM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by titiPT - 18 Sep 10, 05:23PM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by Andrez - 18 Sep 10, 05:24PM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by Xenon - 18 Sep 10, 05:31PM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by haydugjr - 18 Sep 10, 05:39PM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by Robtics - 18 Sep 10, 05:40PM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by haydugjr - 18 Sep 10, 05:46PM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by Xenon - 18 Sep 10, 05:42PM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by P@ndel - 18 Sep 10, 05:46PM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by Robtics - 18 Sep 10, 06:03PM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by -xW-#@bd0u* - 18 Sep 10, 06:11PM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by Acropolips - 18 Sep 10, 09:42PM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by BrickSquad - 18 Sep 10, 09:54PM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by P@ndel - 18 Sep 10, 10:56PM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by C4rma - 19 Sep 10, 12:04AM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by Xenon - 19 Sep 10, 02:14AM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by Shorty - 19 Sep 10, 04:19AM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by pwned - 19 Sep 10, 05:23AM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by pweaks - 19 Sep 10, 07:35AM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by Syntax - 19 Sep 10, 09:01AM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by V-Man - 19 Sep 10, 04:01PM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by MusicMan10 - 20 Sep 10, 01:08AM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by Habluka - 20 Sep 10, 06:53AM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by Xenon - 28 Sep 10, 05:31PM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by Mr.Floppy - 28 Sep 10, 07:05PM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by tempest - 28 Sep 10, 07:15PM
RE: S&D or Search And Destroy - by ExodusS - 02 Oct 10, 06:45PM