Poll: choose the names you prefer (multiple choice allowed)
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
King Of The Hill (KOTH)
9.64%
8 9.64%
Lock Down (LD)
12.05%
10 12.05%
Conquest (CQ)
7.23%
6 7.23%
Domination (DOM)
18.07%
15 18.07%
Hold the Base (HTB)
3.61%
3 3.61%
Base Capture (BC)
10.84%
9 10.84%
Capture The Base (CTB)
12.05%
10 12.05%
Regen Capture (REGEN)
8.43%
7 8.43%
Control Points (CP)
6.02%
5 6.02%
Strategic Regen Capture (SRC)
2.41%
2 2.41%
Strategic Regen Hold (SRH)
1.20%
1 1.20%
Regen Capture Domination (RCD)
1.20%
1 1.20%
Key Point Capture (KPC)
0%
0 0%
Base Grab (BG)
4.82%
4 4.82%
Flag Defense (FD)
2.41%
2 2.41%
Total 83 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

How the future "bases control" gamemode should be named ?
#53
Basically, we got a few words to describe the mode, some are more significative than others, you can take as exemple "base", because in the mod, you are not really owning a base, it's more a zone, a flag, an objective, a site or a strategic point.

So we got those words:

Capture / Lock / Own / Control / Hold / Defend / Grab ...
Base / Site / Zone / Strategic point / Objective ...

But we got also:
Regen / Domniation / Command ...

In my opinion, the main part of this mode is about Capturing flags and Holding it, so why not Capture & Hold? (C&H)

I though about changing the flag colour to get a specific colour especially for this mod, like that we could use the new colour in the name, it's just a detail, but I think this could help to distinguish this new mode from other FFA flag modes and this could help newcomers to see the differences.
Thanks given by:


Messages In This Thread
RE: How the future "bases control" gamemode should be named ? - by ExodusS - 13 Oct 13, 02:40PM