24 Jul 12, 01:56AM
I'm very inconsistent too, depending on map and what mates I have, that alone does not say much. Afaik he either only connected with default win client or Larry's one.
The thing is Xenon: you can be suspicious as you want and he can be as inconsistent as possible, that is no proof of cheating. I've seen lots of suspicious demos from other players, I've seen lots of Bl entries just like yours and ultimately the players were not banned, caus the burden of proof was not met, same goes here. I for instance, (along with many others) always thought that Wolf cheated in that depot game, and yet he say he didn't, his friends believed and that was that, same goes for life, Sepehr, Anthrax, Panico and list can go on and on. I don't care how many come here to say "OBVIOUS WALLHACK!!" caus apart from very few demos I seem, there is no such thing as an wallhack obvious on a demo. That said, unless he admits to it or some conclusive evidence shows this has to be treated like all the other cases mentioned above: no proof, no dice!
Does it mean I trust him 100%? Nope, I don't especially caus he hangs with some cheat prone crowd, but there is no such thing as guilt by association, so if you want a BL you'll have to do better than: he sux at some games but he's better in others.
Since not every suspicious demo got players banned I don't see why this has to be the case now. And don't complain to me. I didn't make AC this way, this community has (with some of its members that are very close to you).
The thing is Xenon: you can be suspicious as you want and he can be as inconsistent as possible, that is no proof of cheating. I've seen lots of suspicious demos from other players, I've seen lots of Bl entries just like yours and ultimately the players were not banned, caus the burden of proof was not met, same goes here. I for instance, (along with many others) always thought that Wolf cheated in that depot game, and yet he say he didn't, his friends believed and that was that, same goes for life, Sepehr, Anthrax, Panico and list can go on and on. I don't care how many come here to say "OBVIOUS WALLHACK!!" caus apart from very few demos I seem, there is no such thing as an wallhack obvious on a demo. That said, unless he admits to it or some conclusive evidence shows this has to be treated like all the other cases mentioned above: no proof, no dice!
Does it mean I trust him 100%? Nope, I don't especially caus he hangs with some cheat prone crowd, but there is no such thing as guilt by association, so if you want a BL you'll have to do better than: he sux at some games but he's better in others.
Since not every suspicious demo got players banned I don't see why this has to be the case now. And don't complain to me. I didn't make AC this way, this community has (with some of its members that are very close to you).