Appeal
#13
(06 Jun 12, 12:33AM)Vermi Wrote: Snap aim isn't professional, in my experience it's also extremely obvious and the leading reason most cheaters are caught.

Hello vermi,

Thanks for your input on my concluding statement. The problem with the final accusation made by jamz is that the accuracy of handling the weapon was over 50%. This leaves the gray area of what constitutes to handling the weapon.

In my instance, I am suspected of using an 'aimbot', or collectively called 'snap aim'. My first intention for this appeal was to examine specific indications of this 'snap aim' occurring. I have examined Mael's concern at nine minutes remaining in the demo, and this can easily be attributed to a high sensitivity on a low resolution (12 sensitivity and 640x480 in my case). This is explained by the fact that resolution does not accurately scale sensitivity.

Thank You,
Rajan
Thanks given by:


Messages In This Thread
Appeal - by TheR - 05 Jun 12, 09:23PM
RE: Appeal - by Medusa - 05 Jun 12, 10:22PM
RE: Appeal - by Aekom - 05 Jun 12, 10:34PM
RE: Appeal - by titiPT - 05 Jun 12, 11:21PM
RE: Appeal - by jamz - 05 Jun 12, 11:21PM
RE: Appeal - by TheR - 06 Jun 12, 12:27AM
RE: Appeal - by TheR - 05 Jun 12, 11:35PM
RE: Appeal - by Mael - 05 Jun 12, 11:36PM
RE: Appeal - by MykeGregory - 05 Jun 12, 11:47PM
RE: Appeal - by titiPT - 06 Jun 12, 12:00AM
RE: Appeal - by Vermi - 06 Jun 12, 12:33AM
RE: Appeal - by TheR - 06 Jun 12, 12:51AM
RE: Appeal - by Vermi - 06 Jun 12, 12:59AM
RE: Appeal - by sgt.d - 06 Jun 12, 01:25AM
RE: Appeal - by Xenon - 07 Jun 12, 05:25AM
RE: Appeal - by jamz - 07 Jun 12, 08:43AM
RE: Appeal - by tempest - 07 Jun 12, 01:19PM
RE: Appeal - by Jason - 07 Jun 12, 11:03PM
RE: Appeal - by paulmuaddibKA - 06 Jun 12, 12:37AM
RE: Appeal - by Aekom - 06 Jun 12, 12:54AM
RE: Appeal - by MerCyKiL - 06 Jun 12, 02:25AM
RE: Appeal - by Mael - 06 Jun 12, 03:59AM
RE: Appeal - by MerCyKiL - 07 Jun 12, 07:09AM
RE: Appeal - by paulmuaddibKA - 06 Jun 12, 02:40AM
RE: Appeal - by MerCyKiL - 06 Jun 12, 03:28AM
RE: Appeal - by paulmuaddibKA - 06 Jun 12, 01:17PM
RE: Appeal - by Vermi - 06 Jun 12, 02:13PM
RE: Appeal - by Ronald_Reagan - 06 Jun 12, 07:25AM
RE: Appeal - by titiPT - 06 Jun 12, 07:40AM
RE: Appeal - by Sepehr - 06 Jun 12, 07:49AM
RE: Appeal - by jamz - 06 Jun 12, 08:29AM
RE: Appeal - by TheR - 06 Jun 12, 10:59AM
RE: Appeal - by Shorty - 06 Jun 12, 10:23AM
RE: Appeal - by Vermi - 06 Jun 12, 12:29PM
RE: Appeal - by kingCHUBBY - 06 Jun 12, 01:09PM
RE: Appeal - by DES|Anderson - 06 Jun 12, 06:48PM
RE: Appeal - by TheR - 06 Jun 12, 08:53PM
RE: Appeal - by YesWeCamp - 06 Jun 12, 09:10PM
RE: Appeal - by tempest - 06 Jun 12, 09:28PM
RE: Appeal - by MykeGregory - 06 Jun 12, 09:37PM
RE: Appeal - by VenteX - 06 Jun 12, 10:00PM
RE: Appeal - by tempest - 06 Jun 12, 10:04PM
RE: Appeal - by GDM - 07 Jun 12, 06:36PM
RE: Appeal - by MykeGregory - 06 Jun 12, 10:06PM
RE: Appeal - by ElCrema - 06 Jun 12, 11:04PM
RE: Appeal - by paulmuaddibKA - 06 Jun 12, 11:24PM
RE: Appeal - by synthes - 07 Jun 12, 02:13AM
RE: Appeal - by Ronald_Reagan - 07 Jun 12, 08:29AM
RE: Appeal - by Xenon - 07 Jun 12, 08:55AM
RE: Appeal - by synthes - 07 Jun 12, 01:09PM
RE: Appeal - by ElCrema - 07 Jun 12, 05:48PM
RE: Appeal - by Cogu - 07 Jun 12, 06:04PM
RE: Appeal - by Xenon - 07 Jun 12, 06:24PM
RE: Appeal - by Xenon - 08 Jun 12, 09:37AM
RE: Appeal - by Jason - 08 Jun 12, 03:17PM
RE: Appeal - by OpenSource - 08 Jun 12, 01:45PM
RE: Appeal - by Xenon - 08 Jun 12, 03:59PM
RE: Appeal - by Jason - 08 Jun 12, 05:53PM
RE: Appeal - by Edward - 08 Jun 12, 04:46PM
RE: Appeal - by Xenon - 08 Jun 12, 06:20PM
RE: Appeal - by jamz - 08 Jun 12, 08:50PM