07 Jan 19, 06:07PM
"no, i invite you to re-read that thread"
Almost all of your posts have been edited again, including the initial post ...
12th March, 2018, 08:37 (This post was last modified: 12th March, 2018, 08:44 by Federico ..)
12th March, 2018, 09:34 (This post was last modified: 12th March, 2018, 14:54 by Federico ..)
13th March, 2018, 19:57 (This post was last modified: 13th March, 2018, 19:58 by Federico ..)
etc..
I will not read that thread again ... I followed it from the beginning and with the changes in the text that you did too ...
"i don't have to follow the new ban policy of 2-3 persons and i don't have to ban someone just because you say so"
This is already clear.
And this shows that everything I wrote is right .... unfortunately.
You defended LeXus! He has a "permaban" and you know it! There is no good explanation for this ....
He is not "someone" and you know it. You defended him.
The next step is to confirm the reason that you have done this ... Very suspicious ...
Almost all of your posts have been edited again, including the initial post ...
12th March, 2018, 08:37 (This post was last modified: 12th March, 2018, 08:44 by Federico ..)
12th March, 2018, 09:34 (This post was last modified: 12th March, 2018, 14:54 by Federico ..)
13th March, 2018, 19:57 (This post was last modified: 13th March, 2018, 19:58 by Federico ..)
etc..
I will not read that thread again ... I followed it from the beginning and with the changes in the text that you did too ...
"i don't have to follow the new ban policy of 2-3 persons and i don't have to ban someone just because you say so"
This is already clear.
And this shows that everything I wrote is right .... unfortunately.
You defended LeXus! He has a "permaban" and you know it! There is no good explanation for this ....
He is not "someone" and you know it. You defended him.
The next step is to confirm the reason that you have done this ... Very suspicious ...